In the future, the landscape of global democracy could undergo significant changes. In Western nations, a growing chasm might develop between their citizens and democratic institutions, fueled by mounting skepticism and alienation. This might be further exacerbated by the escalating complexity and rapid impact of worldwide crises, potentially providing fertile ground for populist and anti-democratic movements to flourish.

Economic turbulence could destabilize democracies across the globe, instigating a shift towards a new system of governance. Meanwhile, the inability of political institutions to swiftly and effectively make decisions might incite rising frustration among the populace, further shaking their faith in democratic processes, which could be perceived as overrated popularity contests.

Authoritarian nations could capitalize on the perceived immunity for their actions, including war conflicts and human rights violations, thus spurring a decline in the global democracy index. Concurrently, as the climate refugee population swells, host nations might witness a parallel rise in the popularity of populist movements. The tragedy of commons could persist, with individual self-interest potentially undermining the well-being of entire communities. Thus, the future might hold a starkly different reality for democracy around the world.

In a future scenario, government systems could evolve beyond being simple popularity contests, instead focusing on substantive policies and leadership qualities that genuinely benefit the public. The integration of blockchain technology into government procedures might revolutionize the system by eliminating corruption and boosting transparency. This technological advancement could give citizens the ability to more accurately assess and rate the performance of governments and political parties, leading to more informed decisions. Furthermore, the adoption of a more aggressive democratic system, similar to that of Switzerland, might be considered. This would involve inviting citizens to constantly vote on a wide array of issues, thereby ensuring persistent and direct public involvement in governance. In such a future, the democratic process could become more transparent, accountable, and closely aligned with the will of the people.

In the future, democracy could integrate a measure to ascertain the quality of its citizens to allow them to participate. This might involve the establishment of a merit-based system to determine voting eligibility based on factors like knowledge and education. A balanced and equitable system might need to be put in place to evaluate these qualifications, thereby deciding who gets the right to vote. Moreover, we might see the emergence of an "extreme voting" system, in which every decision is put to a vote, allowing for comprehensive direct democratic participation.

The global south may pivot away from western democracies, often opting for security over freedom, and align with eastern nations such as China, India, and Russia. This realignment could signal a shift of power from the West to the East.

Simultaneously, we might enter a new era dominated by kingdoms, particularly in the Middle East where rulers hold substantial economic leverage due to control over renewables and oil reserves. Their influence could expand surreptitiously within the western democracies.

Lastly, fundamental changes might be needed regarding the freedom of movement. Governments, which currently view us as assets to retain within borders, need to shift the power back to the individuals. As such, governments could compete to offer better living conditions and infrastructure, prompting people to contemplate - where next?